‘Task of moving Zim ahead not only for President, Govt’
South Africa-based Zimbabwean economist, Vusi Nyamazana — who
has developed a government policy tracker eponymously called
MnangagwaMeter following the ushering in of the new dispensation last
year — says President Mnangagwa achieved a lot in his first eight months
before the July 30 elections. With a new mandate, President Mnangagwa
is set to achieve more, but it is the duty of citizens to also take part
in the development of the country. Nyamazana says his barometer will
help Government and citizens stay in the loop in terms of the country’s
trajectory in the next five years. The Herald’s Political Editor
Tichaona Zindoga (TZ) caught up with Nyamazana (VN) to discuss the
initiative.
TZ: Can you tell us about the polimeter; how it started and what you seek to achieve with this kind of initiative?
VN: The whole idea started when
the new dispensation was ushered in because there were high expectations
as Zimbabweans and the international community wanted to know what the
President would be doing and what he would achieve in the caretaker
term.
So, the idea of the polimeter was to try to collect all
pronouncements by the President in terms of promises and track the
progress towards the fulfilment of the same. So, in a way it was more of
an informational tool for citizens so that citizens will know what the
Government is doing and they can easily comment where progress is made
and criticise where the Government fails to honour its promises.
The other aspect is to sensitise the Government that citizens
are monitoring what they are doing and in a way can improve in policy
implementation.
In a nutshell, the idea behind this is to highlight Government
progress or lack thereof, and also provide an interface with citizens
through their monitorial function.
TZ: How do you collect your indices and make measurements and how reliable is this barometer?
VN: The meter is reliable because
it is fact-based, that is we take promises from official channels or
other sources that we can all agree that they represent true positions
of Government, for example the Press. The information, therefore, comes
from inauguration speeches, information on the Government websites,
fiscal and monetary policies and other official pronouncements. These
are quite authoritative sources.
On tracking the promises, we use the media, especially The
Herald and The Sunday Mail, as papers of record and they also report
accurately on what the Government is doing. The information is factual.
We don’t put any opinion on the information: it’s just taking facts as
they are, collecting them and consolidating so that we have all
information on one platform.
TZ: You monitored the first seven to eight months of
the transitional period to the July elections. Can you tell us the
highlights and what you found in your assessment?
VN: The President hit the ground
running because it looks like he had a clear mandate, when it related to
governance he was sure where the problems were and came up with
solutions and as soon as he came in he put in several structures in
place and some reforms which are more administrative, especially in the
Public Service and Finance ministries. He made sure that it had to be
business as usual and there had to be coherence.
In our assessment, he split his duties into two: governance and
economy and we can safely conclude that governance did extremely well,
but on the economy he inherited an economy that was already in trouble,
so any programme would have lagged behind. The programmes introduced
through the budget and monetary policy were quite important. However,
some issues such as the cash liquidity issues are related to structural
problems such as production and export.
Some programmes are likely to be concluded in the early days of
this Second Republic. Obviously, we are looking forward to them being
actioned in the new term.
TZ: The Government of Zimbabwe has previously used some
indicators and devices for monitoring and evaluation of performance.
What is your comment on the general policy monitoring in Zimbabwe and
what should be done with the new administration?
VN: There has always been a
monitoring policy even during the Mugabe era. However, when President
Mnangagwa came in, he came up with the idea of 100-day cycles to be
implemented across Government, at ministries, departments and all
parastatals. They in turn came up with 100-day plans. There were some
successes, but a lot needs to be done in reorientation of the public
service because these bureaucrats may not have been used to a new work
ethic and way of doing things.
It is rather regrettable that some departments failed to pick
some low hanging fruits. We need to take policy monitoring seriously
because it is the nerve centre of Government and resource it adequately.
There is need for clarity in the establishment of monitoring and
evaluation entities in Government and that monitoring and evaluation at
national level should cascade down to lower levels of governance.
TZ: You want to target Government delivery and in
particular the performance of the President. But there have been
concerns about citizens and the private sector not playing ball. What
would be your comment on the role of civil society and the private
sector in ensuring that Zimbabwe goes forward?
VN: The task of moving Zimbabwe
ahead is not only for the President and his Government. Every citizen
should contribute in their own special way. Looking at other non-state
actors like the CSOs and private sectors they also have a critical role
to play in making sure that service delivery happens. It will be
necessary to track what the private sectors and others are doing in
contributing towards the global goals that the President has set.
TZ: Earlier we discussed about the eight months that
you monitored given the momentum that you saw, what would be your
prediction on President Mnangagwa`s capacity to deliver in the next five
years?
VN: The outlook is positive, in
the first eight months President Mnangagwa had to inherit a bureaucracy
that had its own issues and wasn’t that dynamic. In this full-term I
think he has more room to recruit on merit and have everyone focus on
what needs to be done. I believe performance management will take centre
stage, chances are high that he will make much more progress than in
the first eight months.
Comments
Post a Comment